MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4383899685 · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3294247

Compact Depth-Wise Separable Precise Network for Depth Completion

2023· article· en· W4383899685 on OpenAlexaff
Tianqi Wang, Nilanjan Ray

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Vision and Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceConvolution (computer science)ScalabilityConvolutional neural networkMargin (machine learning)EncoderStability (learning theory)Artificial intelligenceEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionDeep learningComputer engineeringAlgorithmArtificial neural networkMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Predicting a dense depth map from synchronized LiDAR scans and RGB images using compact deep neural networks presents a significant challenge. While most state-of-the-art models enhance prediction accuracy by increasing the number of parameters, leading to substantial memory consumption, depth completion tasks in areas such as autonomous driving primarily utilize edge devices powered by embedded GPUs. In this paper, we introduce a methodology for creating an efficient, high-fidelity depth completion model derived from a base model. Our proposed compact model replaces conventional convolutional encoder layers with depth-wise separable convolutions, and transposed convolutional decoders with up-sampling plus depth-wise separable convolution. We further employ random layer pruning as a stability test, guiding the design of our architecture and preventing over-parameterization. Additionally, we introduce a straightforward yet robust knowledge distillation method to enhance network performance and improve model scalability to meet higher quality requirements. Our experimental results demonstrate substantial improvement over existing compact models in terms of state-of-the-art performance, while significantly reducing the number of parameters compared to larger models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.943
Threshold uncertainty score0.573

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicAdvanced Vision and ImagingFrench-language works237,207