MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4383903809 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3051400/v1

Pediatric Pulmonary Multisystem Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Does lung lesion severity affect the outcome?

2023· preprint· en· W4383903809 on OpenAlexaff
Mohamed Sedky, Seham Gohar, Sonia Ahmed, Iman Zaky, Asmaa Salama, Omayma Hassanein, Eslam Maher, Alaa Elhaddad

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHistiocytic Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsPediatric Oncology Group
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLangerhans cell histiocytosisAffect (linguistics)MedicineLungHistiocytosisLesionPathologyInternal medicinePsychologyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Pulmonary involvement in pediatric multisystem Langerhans cell histiocytosis (PPM LCH) is associated with either low risk (RO-) or high risk (RO+) organs. The nodulo-cystic lung lesions although pathognomonic, yet are very variable in severity and remain a source of controversy in certifying pulmonary LCH diagnosis. The study aimed to examine the prognostic value of clinical respiratory distress and radiological lung lesions severity. This is through associating a CT chest triad of bilateral, extensive and diffuse lesions. It is a retrospective study of 350 LCH patients who received systemic treatment at Children’s Cancer Hospital Egypt during the period from 2007 to 2020. Results Sixty-seven patients (67/350 − 19.1%) had PPM LCH at presentation. Severe lung lesions were present in 24 of them. The median follow-up period was 61 months (IQR: 3.4 to 8.3). The 5-year overall survival (OS) and event free survival (EFS) was 89% and 56.6% respectively. The EFS, for severe radiological lesions triad was 38% ± 20.7 versus 66% ± 16.2 for non-severe lesions p 0.002, while for concordant chest CT positive / X ray positive lesions 27% ± 22.344 versus discordant CT positive/X ray negative 66% ± 14.7 p 0.001, for clinical respiratory distress 13% ± 13.9 versus none 62% ± 22.9 p < 0.001, for RO- with severe lung lesions 47% ± 30.4 versus RO- without severe lung 69% ± 5.9 p0.04. There was a tendency for the independent prognostic impact of severe lung involvement; aHR = 1.7 (95% CI: 0.92 to 3.13, p = 0.09). Conclusion Although the lung is a low -risk organ per se in LCH, our study demonstrates a non negligeable prognostic impact of severe lung involvement in the risk stratification of pediatric LCH. This warrants further study and external validation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.117
GPT teacher head0.426
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch SquareSame topicHistiocytic Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207