Efficacy and Safety Outcomes of XEN Implantation and Gonioscopy-assisted Transluminal Trabeculotomy for the Management of Advanced Open-angle Glaucoma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aim: Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) is not typically used in patients with advanced-stage glaucoma. This study describes the outcomes and complications of patients with advanced open-angle glaucoma (OAG) who underwent XEN implantation with cataract surgery or gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy (GATT) with cataract surgery. Methods: This retrospective study identified patients who had undergone XEN implantation or GATT for the management of advanced OAG. Outcomes included surgical success, intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction, number of topical IOP-lowering drops, visual field mean deviation (MD), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and complications. Surgical success was defined as an IOP of <14 mm Hg and a 20% reduction at 12 months without topical IOP-lowering drops (complete success) or with topical IOP-lowering drops (qualified success). Results: < 0.001) cohorts at 12 months postoperatively. The only complication reported was transient hyphema, which occurred in three patients from the XEN group and four from the GATT group, and resolved spontaneously. Conclusions: Both XEN implantation and GATT may be safe and effective management options when treating patients with advanced OAG. However, larger sample sizes are required to make direct statistical comparisons between these techniques. Clinical significance: In this study, XEN implantation and GATT combined with cataract surgery were each associated with favorable outcomes in patients with advanced OAG. How to cite this article: Ruparelia S, Sharif M, Shoham-Hazon N. Efficacy and Safety Outcomes of XEN Implantation and Gonioscopy-assisted Transluminal Trabeculotomy for the Management of Advanced Open-angle Glaucoma. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2023;17(2):63-67.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".