MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4383911578 · doi:10.1002/hyp.14926

JAMES BUTTLE REVIEW: A resilience framework for physical hydrology

2023· article· en· W4383911578 on OpenAlexafffundabout
B Newton, Christopher Spence

Bibliographic record

VenueHydrological Processes · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaAlberta Environment and Protected Areas
FundersEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceResilience (materials science)Hydrology (agriculture)Tipping point (physics)WatershedClimate changeStreamflowClimatologyEnvironmental resource managementGeographyComputer scienceDrainage basinEcologyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Hydrological systems across the globe are increasingly subjected to pressures from a warming climate and anthropogenic disturbance. Responses to stress can be nonlinear and variable; therefore, it is imperative to improve understanding of resilience and tipping points of these systems. Previous applications of resilience concepts to physical hydrology have been disconnected, and an increasing range of definitions and approaches has often led to improper applications. Here, upon synthesizing relevant literature, we define physical hydrological resilience as the ability of a watershed to maintain hydrological function while exposed to a stressor or perturbation, thus remaining within the same regime. From this definition a new framework for physical hydrological resilience is forwarded which includes four key traits that must be part of a robust application of resilience for physical hydrology. Any evaluation of resilience should (1) identify and justify a baseline regime; (2) evaluate hydrological function, one or more of collection, storage and release; (3); assess physical hydrological systems for both resistance and latitude and (4) evaluate important perturbations and processes and how they interact to manifest into resistance, latitude, and tipping points. The framework is applied to the example of the Elbow River in Alberta, Canada, using baseline (1979–2015) and future (2050–2080) conditions. Two key hydrological processes, snow accumulation and streamflow, are found to have low resistance to winter duration and late spring precipitation, respectively. The collection function is resilient to a warmer, wetter climate due to a large latitude in relation to air temperatures, while the release function is not resilient, shifting from a streamflow‐ towards an evapotranspiration‐dominated regime in the future. The successful application of the concepts of resilience to this complex catchment demonstrates how the framework could be applied across a diversity of catchments. Results of resilience studies can improve environmental monitoring and evaluation programs and complement social‐ecological resilience frameworks and water management strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.587
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2023
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHydrological ProcessesSame topicHydrology and Watershed Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207