The Authoritarian State Form, Reconfiguration of Power Bloc, and the Growth Model in Turkey in the 21st century
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article analyzes the continuities and changes in state form, forms of regime, power bloc, and growth model of Turkey in the 21st century, using the analytical tools provided by critical state theory and research on financialization and growth models. I argue that there has been a reconfiguration of the power bloc in the 2010s, which symbolized the search for an alternative compared to the debt-led and domestic-demand-oriented growth pattern of the 2000s. However, these macroeconomic measures were unsystematic until the Covid-19 pandemic, and the state’s mechanisms to incorporate large social groups and tools to support capital accumulation mainly remained the same in the 2010s. Despite the reconfiguration of the power bloc and the search for a new growth model in the mid-to-late 2010s, I stress the continuation of the authoritarian state form in Turkey until the Covid-19 pandemic and conceive the transition to a new regime in the 2010s as a change in the form of regime.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".