MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4383998635 · doi:10.1094/pdis-05-23-0900-sr

Health Status of Ready-to-Plant Grapevine Nursery Material in Canada Regarding Young Vine Decline Fungi

2023· article· en· W4383998635 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jared Hrycan, Jane Theilmann, April Mahovlic, J. Boulé

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Disease · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
Canadian institutionsOkanagan University CollegeUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British ColumbiaAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVineBiologyVitis viniferaBotanyHorticulture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Young vine decline (YVD), caused by several taxonomically different fungi, results in the decline and death of grapevines within a few years after planting. Infection can occur in nursery mother blocks and/or at several stages in the nursery propagation process, but the final plant material may remain asymptomatic. Four nurseries that sell ready-to-plant grapevines in Canada were sampled to evaluate the health status with regard to YVD fungi, including Botryosphaeriaceae spp., Cadophora luteo-olivacea, Dactylonectria macrodidyma, Dactylonectria torresensis, Phaeoacremonium minimum, and Phaeomoniella chlamydospora. Plants representing three cultivars, ‘Chardonnay’, ‘Merlot’, and ‘Pinot noir’, either grafted onto ‘3309C’ rootstock or self-rooted, were provided by the nurseries. Samples from the roots, base of the rootstock or self-rooted cultivar, graft-union, and scion were collected from each plant. DNA was extracted, and the total abundance of each fungus was quantified using Droplet Digital PCR. Results revealed that 99% of plants harbored at least one of the fungi studied, with a mean of three different fungal species that were present per grapevine. Droplet Digital PCR results showed that the abundance of the different fungi significantly varied between different sections of each plant, individual plants for each cultivar, and cultivars from the same nursery. Necrosis measurements were recorded from the base of the rootstock or self-rooted cultivars and did not correlate with fungal abundance recorded in that section for each grapevine, but necrosis was consistent across cultivars within nurseries. Five different rootstocks were compared from one nursery, and results showed no differences between rootstocks and their health status. Among all nurseries, C. luteo-olivacea was the most prevalent fungus (97% of the plants), while D. macrodidyma was the least commonly found (13% of the plants). This study shows that ready-to-plant nursery material sold in Canada is likely to be infected with several YVD fungi and that presence and abundance of fungi vary significantly among individual grapevines and nurseries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.516
Threshold uncertainty score0.829

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant DiseaseSame topicPlant Pathogens and Fungal DiseasesFrench-language works237,207