Body Composition and Physical Activity in Pediatric Intestinal Failure On and Off Parenteral Nutrition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Data on the relationship between body composition (BC) and physical activity (PA) in children with intestinal failure (IF) are lacking. The objectives were to collect data on PA and BC in children with IF, both parenterally and enterally fed, and to assess the relationship between PA and BC. METHODS: Cross-sectional study in children 5-18 years with IF including those receiving parenteral nutrition (PN) and those fully enterally fed. PA levels were measured using accelerometry. BC was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Data were compared to age- and sex-matched population norms using t tests. Regression analysis assessed the relationship between BC and PA. RESULTS: Fifty-eight children with IF (38 males), mean (SD) age of 10.0 (3.5) years, 20 dependent on PN were included. Patients with IF had significantly fewer steps per day ( P ≤ 0.001) compared with literature controls, with a mean (SD) of 7,972 (3,008) and 11,749 (1,106), respectively. There were no significant differences between patients receiving PN and those enterally fed, but both groups were significantly less active than literature controls ( P < 0.001). Patients with IF had higher fat mass and lower fat-free mass compared to literature controls ( P = 0.008). PA had a significant effect on BC ( r2 = 0.32, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Children with IF, those receiving PN and those fully enterally fed, are at risk of decreased PA and altered BC. PA should be part of ongoing rehabilitation and management to optimize outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".