MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4384024954 · doi:10.1117/12.2691347

Development of high-power Er/Yb polarization-maintaining optical amplifier for ground station uplink systems

2023· article· en· W4384024954 on OpenAlexaff
Hamid E Limodehi, Youngjae Kim, S.B. Papernyi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Fiber Laser Technologies
Canadian institutionsMPB Technologies & Communications (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmplifierMaterials scienceOpticsOptoelectronicsBooster (rocketry)Extinction ratioLaserWavelengthElectrical engineeringPhysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A high-power Er/Yb polarization-maintaining fiber amplifier is described. The amplifier operates on a single wavelength of 1546 nm and consists of a pre-amplifier with a gain up to 64 dB followed by a double-clad 25/300-m Large Mode Area (LMA) Er/Yb fiber booster stage, counter-pumped through a (2+1):1 PM combiner by two 140-W 915-nm laser diodes. The design of the amplifier required developing new splicing and re-coating approaches for the LMA PM fibers and characterizing mode-field adaptors for single- mode (SM) and LMA fibers and low-loss high-power PM pump-signal combiners maintaining a high Polarization Extinction Ratio (PER). The amplifier provides a robust diffraction-limited output of more than 50 W from true single-mode PM1550 fiber with an M2 < 1.03 and a long-term (~200 hours) stability better than 5% in constant current mode (i.e., no power control feedback loop). With low-loss, high-quality splices between fibers with different MFDs, the maximum local fiber temperatures were kept below 60 oC. The amplifier design ensured that, even when operating at the 50-W level, the parasitic ASE in the 1-micron region was less than 2 mW. The output PER of <15 dB was limited by the quality of the pump-signal combiner which has a high probability of being improved in the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Fiber Laser TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207