Bilateral simultaneous endophthalmitis after immediately sequential bilateral cataract surgery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: Immediately sequential bilateral cataract surgery (ISBCS) has recently been considered effective due to faster visual rehabilitation and further improvements in quality of life. We report on the treatment course of a case of early postoperative endophthalmitis in both eyes after ISBCS. Observations: The patient was a 75-year-old woman undergoing anticancer treatment for lung cancer, who had been receiving eye drops for bilateral uveitis and secondary glaucoma since 2019. She underwent ISBCS at another hospital in 2022. In that surgery, the same instruments were used for the surgery of both eyes, without resterilization between eyes. On the night of the following day, she became aware of vision loss in both eyes, and at the examination the next day, hypopyon and corneal edema were found and she was diagnosed with bilateral postoperative endophthalmitis, and referred to our hospital. On the same day, anterior chamber irrigation, posterior capsulotomy, and vitrectomy were performed on both eyes, and the intraocular lenses were preserved. There was no recurrence of postoperative inflammation, and visual acuity was 20/30 in both eyes 6 months after vitrectomy. Conclusion: ISBCS is recommended to be performed with complete aseptic separation of the patient's two procedures. This important rule was not followed in this case. ISBCS should be performed in accordance with accepted protocols, such as those of the International Society of Bilateral Cataract Surgeons, the Royal College of Ophthalmologists, and the Canadian Ophthalmological Society.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".