MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4384026090 · doi:10.1055/s-0043-1769864

Molecular classification of vulval cancer: Comparing pre-surgical biopsy and surgical specimen of radical vulvectomy from the same patients

2023· article· en· W4384026090 on OpenAlexaff
M. Forberger, Gesine Grit Ruth Hiller, Anne Kathrin Höhn, Irene Krücken, Elizabeth Thompson, L. N. Hoang, Andrea Palicelli, Karen L. Talia, Naïri Tchrakian, Janine Senz, Andrew R. Jamieson, Jutta Huvila, Jessica N. McAlpine, C. Blake Gilks, Michael Höckel, Naveena Singh, Lars‐Christian Horn

Bibliographic record

VenueGeburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGenital Health and Disease
Canadian institutionsVancouver General HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLichen sclerosusRadical VulvectomyBiopsyMedicinePathologyLesionVulvar cancerP53 expressionImmunohistochemistryVulvectomyVulvaOncology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Classification of vulvar carcinoma (VCX) into one of the three molecular subtypes has significant prognostic and therapeutic impact. An HPV-associated lesion that is p16 positive and p53 wild type represents improved prognosis compared to other subtypes. HPV-independent VCX, mostly associated with lichen sclerosus is characterized by TP53-alteration (i.e. aberrant p53-expression) and p16 non-aberrant staining. A third (minor) subtype is characterized by normal staining for both markers. It has been shown that patients with p53-aberrant tumors may benefit from more radical surgical approach. Contrary, HPV-high risk associated VCA (with p16-block positivity) represent better response to chemoradiation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.647

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeburtshilfe und FrauenheilkundeSame topicGenital Health and DiseaseFrench-language works237,207