MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4384029574 · doi:10.1093/noajnl/vdad071.045

OSMR INTERACTOME MAPPING REVEALS THE SIGNIFICANCE OF A CHLORIDE CHANNEL IN CYTOKINE REGULATION AND BRAIN TUMOUR STEM CELL SELF-RENEWAL

2023· article· en· W4384029574 on OpenAlexaff
Kamaldeep Randhawa, Jamie Snider, Laura Raco, Igor Štagljar, Arezu Jahani‐Asl

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology Advances · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCaveolin-1 and cellular processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyCell biologySignal transductionInteractomeCancer researchBiochemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Oncostatin M Receptor (OSMR) is a key regulator of brain tumour stem cell (BTSC) self-renewal and glioblastoma (GB) tumourigenesis. This receptor is found in a complex with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor variant III (EGFRvIII) and orchestrates a positive feedback loop with STAT3. OSMR also regulates oxidative phosphorylation and participates in promoting the transition of cells towards mesenchymal-like glioma states. How OSMR drives GB tumorigenesis via multiple mechanisms remains largely unclear. Here, we map OSMR interactome in different GB subtypes using the Mammalian Membrane Two Hybrid High Throughput Screen (MaMTH-HTS). Analysis of these data followed by functional validation has uncovered distinct OSMR interactome in a context dependent manner. Follow up investigations, however, have led to the discovery of the Chloride Intracellular Channel 1 (CLIC1), essential in the regulation of OSMR cytokine signaling and GB progression independently of the genetic profile of the GB tumour. CLIC1 forms a complex with OSMR to promote BTSC self-renewal and knockout of CLIC1 or pharmacological inhibitors to CLIC1 impairs OSM mediated STAT3 phosphorylation. Our work suggests that CLIC1 and OSMR forms a complex in BTSCs and functionally interact to activate STAT3.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.497

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-Oncology AdvancesSame topicCaveolin-1 and cellular processesFrench-language works237,207