A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY TO ESTIMATE THE LEVEL OF AWARENESS REGARDING 'HOME BASED NEW BORN CARE' AMONG ASHAS AND MOTHERS OF YOUNG INFANT IN RURAL JAIPUR, RAJASTHAN
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Home Based New Born Care (HBNC) scheme has been implemented for reduction of neonatal mortality through ASHAs along with the care being provided by mother and her family. The aim of this study was to estimate level of awareness in mothers of young infant and ASHAs involved in Home based New born Care. Aim and Objectives: To nd out the level of awareness among mothers and ASHAs regarding Home Based New born Care of recently delivered mothers The study was of infant 6-14 weeks age Jaipur district has 13 blocks. Materials and Methods: conducted in rural areas of two blocks of Jaipur which were Amber and Sanganer from which 30 villages were selected randomly (15 villages from each block) for a duration of 1 year to complete sample size of 350 mothers of young infant 6-14 weeks age and 67 available ASHAs in these villages. A pre-designed and pretested questionnaire was used to collect the information where the rst part included information regarding sociodemographic prole and HBNC knowledge related questions among mothers and the second part comprised of sociodemographic prole and HBNC knowledge related questions among ASHAs. Mean age of mothers was 25.04 years with standard deviation 3.6 Results: 1 years and 89.43% mothers were Hindu and remaining 10.57% mothers were Muslims. Majority of mothers had knowledge about danger signs of fever (97.72%) and fast breathing (85.72%) followed by not taking feed (18.85%), hypothermia (13.42%), grunting (4%) and pustules (3.72%). Majority of ASHAs had knowledge about danger signs of fever (85.07%), fast breathing (41.79%), not taking feed (47.76%), while poor knowledge for pustule and grunting. 98.28% institutional deliveries but 20.57% mothers were aware about the HBNC provision for home visits. Majority of ASHA (97.02%) had HBNC home visit form, 94.03% have functional weighing scale with sling, 97.02% have digital thermometer and only 14.92% have Syrup Paracetamol with her on home visit. Conclusions: The awareness amongst mothers and ASHAs related to danger signs in newborn is still low so they should be counselled and made aware of these signs so that timely referral be made and hence appropriate treatment be given which can prevent neonatal mortality
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".