MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4384120315 · doi:10.1111/acps.13591

Comorbidity in pediatric bipolar disorder: An unmet challenge in need of treatment studies

2023· letter· en· W4384120315 on OpenAlexafffund
Benjamin I. Goldstein

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Psychiatrica Scandinavica · 2023
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBipolar Disorder and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
FundersNational Institute of Mental HealthUniversity of TorontoCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCentre for Addiction and Mental Health FoundationFondation Brain CanadaHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsMental healthBipolar disorderPsychiatryAddictionComorbidityLibrary scienceCitationMedicinePsychologyMood

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this edition of Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, Fahrendorff and colleagues report findings from their systematic review examining psychiatric comorbidity in pediatric bipolar disorder (1).The scientific literature regarding pediatric bipolar disorder has increased significantly over the past two decades, and this manuscript provides a helpful synopsis regarding psychiatric comorbidity in children and adolescents with bipolar disorder.Before turning to the details of the current study, it is important to provide context from the international epidemiology of psychiatric comorbidity in adult bipolar disorder.A World Mental Health Survey Initiative study, which included 61,392 community adults from 11 countries in the Americas, Asia, and Europe, examined psychiatric comorbidity among individuals with bipolar spectrum disorders (2).The most common comorbidities were anxiety disorders, behavior disorders, and substance use disorders.Comorbidity patterns for anxiety disorders and substance use disorder showed substantial international consistency, although rates of comorbid behavior disorders were much higher in the U.S. and New Zealand than in most other countries.Over three-quarters of adults with bipolar disorder had at least one psychiatric comorbidity, and nearly half had three or more comorbidities.This is remarkable for a number of reasons, including the fact that the sample was community based, rather than clinical, and the fact that these data are not constrained to one country or one sample, but rather reflective of a highly consistent pattern of multi-comorbidity in bipolar disorder.Discourse regarding psychiatric comorbidity in pediatric bipolar disorder often focuses on differential diagnosis in general, and the issue of overlapping diagnostic criteria in particular (3).This relates especially to attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and diagnoses characterized by severe irritability (e.g.disruptive mood dysregulation disorder [DMDD], oppositional defiant disorder [ODD]).Interwoven within this discourse are the themes of international differences in diagnostic practices and concerns around so-called overdiagnosis (i.e.false positives).While the aforementioned findings regarding comorbidity in adult bipolar disorder do not resolve debates around differential diagnosis or international differences in diagnostic approaches, they do establish that multi-comorbidity is a reality

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.502
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Psychiatrica ScandinavicaSame topicBipolar Disorder and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207