MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4384157709 · doi:10.32664/smatika.v13i01.719

Pendeteksi Mobil Berdasarkan Merek dan Tipe Menggunakan Algoritma YOLO

2023· article· id· W4384157709 on OpenAlexaff
Al Riansyah, Ahmad Haidar Mirza

Bibliographic record

VenueSMATIKA JURNAL · 2023
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputer Science and Engineering
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The government system in an area or city has regulations in regulating the activities of its residents, especially those related to driving on the highway. Traffic violations often occur on urban roads and highways, this can trigger accidents due to violating traffic regulations. This has prompted the government to take firm measures against motorists who violate regulations. Therefore we need a system that can help monitor traffic conditions. So, the aims this research is create a system that is able to detect car vehicles based on the brand and type with a high level of detection accuracy, so that it can make it easier to recognize car objects around. The detection system will be developed using the YOLO (You Only Look Once) Algorithm, because YOLO is one of the fastest and most accurate methods of object detection and is even capable of exceeding 2 times the capabilities of other algorithms. The YOLO (You Only Look Once) algorithm is an architecture of Deep Learning and an algorithm developed to detect an object in real-time. Detection is carried out on the image, and when accessing a laptop webcam, which contains a car object, uses a model from a dataset that has been trained using the Darknet framework. The detected car object will have a bounding box in the object area, and there will be a description of the car name and type and year of production in the bounding box area. Based on the classification performance test of the data that has been trained, it shows that the accuracy value reaches 92% so it can be concluded that the system can work well.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.059

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSMATIKA JURNALSame topicComputer Science and EngineeringFrench-language works237,207