MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4384205901 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3152670/v1

National multicentered retrospective review of clinical and intraoperative factors associated with the development of cerebellar mutism after pediatric posterior fossa tumor resection

2023· preprint· en· W4384205901 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Michelle Kameda-Smith, Malavan Ralugojan, Cameron Elliott, Lori Bliss, Hanna Moore, Nicholas Sader, Mosaab Alsuwaihel, Michael K. Tso, Ayoub Dakson, Olufemi Ajani, Blake Yarascavitch, Adam Fleming, Vivek Mehta, Minoo Aminnejad, Forough Farrokhyar, Sheila K. Singh

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHead and Neck Surgical Oncology
Canadian institutionsDalhousie UniversityUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of AlbertaMcMaster University
FundersUniversity of AlbertaMcMaster UniversityHamilton Health Sciences
KeywordsMedicineMedulloblastomaRetrospective cohort studyEpendymomaPilocytic astrocytomaAstrocytomaHistopathologySurgeryVentricleInternal medicineGliomaPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Cerebellar mutism (CM) is characterized by a significant loss of speech in children following posterior fossa (PF) surgery. The biological origin of CM remains unclear and is the subject of ongoing debate. Significant recovery from CM is less likely than previously described despite rigorous multidisciplinary neuro-rehabilitational efforts. Methods A national multi-centered retrospective review of all children undergoing PF resection in 4 midsized Canadian academic pediatric institutions was undertaken. Patient, tumor, and surgical factors associated with the post-operative development of CM were reviewed. Retrospective identification of PF surgery patients including those developing and those that did not (internal control). Results The study identified 258 patients across the 4 centers between 2010–2020 (mean age 6.73 years; 42.2 female). Overall, CM was experienced in 19.5% of patients (N = 50). Amongst children who developed CM histopathology included medulloblastoma (35.7%), pilocytic astrocytoma (32.6%), and ependymoma (17.1%). Intraoperative impression of adherence to the floor of the 4th ventricle was positive in 36.8%. Intraoperative abrupt changes in blood pressure and/or heart rate were identified in 19.4% and 17.8% of cases. The clinical resolution of CM was rated to be complete, significant resolution, slight improvement, no improvement, and deterioration in 56.0%, 8.0%, 20.0%, 14.0%, 2.0%, respectively. In the cohort of children who experienced post-operative CM as compared to their no-CM counterpart, proportionally more tumors were felt to be adherent to the floor of the 4th ventricle (56.0% vs 49.5%), intraoperative extent of resection was a GTR (74% vs 68.8%), and changes in heart rate were noted (≥ 20% from baseline) (26.0% vs 15.9%). However, a logistic regression for experiencing CM identified only intraoperative impression of adherence to the floor of the 4th ventricle (OR 2.32, p = 0.011), abrupt changes in intraoperative HR (> 20% from baseline) (OR 2.34, p = 0.028), and medulloblastoma histology (OR 3.77, p = 0.001) to significantly associated with development of post-operative CM. Conclusion As a devastating surgical complication, identifying and understanding the biological origin of CM is the first step to complication avoidance. Maximal safe resection irrespective of intraoperative pathology remains the strategy to minimize the devastating post-operative development of CM.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.181
GPT teacher head0.474
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch SquareSame topicHead and Neck Surgical OncologyFrench-language works237,207