Bibliographic record
Abstract
Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the most common indolent lymphoma. It is estimated that approximately 2,000 Canadians are newly diagnosed with FL each year; however, this is an underestimation of the disease burden due to the indolent nature of FL. Indeed, the life expectancy for most patients can be measured in decades, with slow but constant improvement in survival estimates having been achieved over time. Traditionally, FL has been considered a chemo-sensitive disease and, for the last 15 years, antibodies targeting the CD20 surface epitope on B cells have become a compelling adjunct to induce long-lasting remission in the frontline setting. Outcomes are favourable for most patients; a long-term follow-up from the seminal PRIMA trial showed that the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 10.5 years in patients treated with immunochemotherapy as part of an initial induction regimen followed by rituximab maintenance, as compared with just over 4 years in the control arm (initial induction regimen followed by observation). In terms of chemotherapy backbone, bendamustine has established itself as the preferred standard in Canada and induces durable response in the majority of patients. This article will focus on patients with high-tumour burden disease in need of treatment, as opposed to patients with limited-stage disease who may benefit from localized radiation or patients with advanced-stage with low-tumour burden disease who may benefit from observation or single agent rituximab.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".