Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nicknames and pseudonyms are one of the subjects that should be studied carefully in Turkish literature. Nicknames and pseudonyms are “fake names” and “symbols” that poets and writers use to hide their real identities for various reasons. These names and symbols, which are extremely important in identifying the works of poets and writers, allow literary historians to make more accurate analyzes about poets and writers. Therefore, each new nicknames and pseudonym identified has a great importance in eliminating the deficiencies of the literary history. Ahmet Rasim (1865-21 September 1932) produced works in different literary genres such as poetry, stories, novels, memoirs, anecdotes, conversations, articles, essays, translations, history, criticism, and monographs throughout his 48-year writing life. The author also has school books and scientific works. However, his main qualification is journalism. Ahmet Rasim, who makes a living with his pen, wrote and published articles in different literary genres under different pseudonyms in the magazines and newspapers he worked for. Situations and thoughts like not being confident enough to put your real name on your works when he was just starting his life in literature and the press, show the writer staff of magazines and newspapers rich, distinguish between humorous and serious writing, attracting female readers attention, avoiding the reaction of his works depending on the social, political and literary conditions of the period and breaking of the censor can be counted among the reasons why Ahmet Rasim used different nicknames and pseudonyms. Although Ahmet Rasim uses many nickname and pseudonyms, very few of them are known by the literary world. In this study, the nickname and pseudonyms that we determined to be used by the author will be revealed. Keywords: Ahmet Rasim, literature and press, journalism, nickname and pseudonyms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it