THE ROLE OF SOCIAL SUPPORT IN SEEKING MENTAL HEALTH CONSULTATIONS IN PEOPLE WITH MOOD DISORDERS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine the role of social support in seeking mental health consultations in people with mood disorders.Several researchers have suggested that social support increases help-seeking behaviours and mental health service use among individuals with depression and other related mood disorders.Other researchers suggest that social support increases one's use of general medical services but not for those with psychiatric illnesses requiring mental health consultations.Research in this area has examined the influence of social support in general; however, many of these studies have failed to examine the specific role of family support and friend support in seeking out mental health services in individuals with mood disorders.Moreover, researchers have mostly examined the influence of social support in seeking mental health services among young adults (i.e., college students) with mood disorders.Due to the discrepancies and gaps in the literature, the current study explored the relation between mood disorder and mental health consultation and whether this relation was moderated by friend and family support.Using data from the 2017/2018 Canadian Community Health Survey, we examined family satisfaction (i.e., family support), friend satisfaction (i.e., friend support), presence of a mood disorder (i.e., depression, bipolar disorder, mania, dysthymia), and mental healthcare access within the past 12 months (i.e., mental health consultations) in a large sample (N = 26,448) of individuals aged 12 to 80+ years.Data analysis was performed with Stata 15 and we used binary logistic regression.Having a mood disorder was found to significantly increase the likelihood of mental health consultations.In turn, family and friend satisfaction were found to be significant negative predictors of mental health consultation.Interaction terms between mood disorder and family satisfaction and mood disorder and friend satisfaction were examined.The linear effect of family satisfaction and friend satisfaction on mental health consultations for individuals with a mood disorder was positive, albeit non-significant.In contrast, the linear effect of family satisfaction and friend satisfaction on mental health consultations for individuals without a mood disorder was negative.These findings support that mood disorder works in conjunction with family and friend satisfaction to predict mental health consultations; in the absence of a mood disorder, higher satisfaction with family and with friends is associated with lower mental health consultations.Overall, further research should continue to investigate the influence of friend and family support on seeking mental health consultation in people with mood disorders.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".