CoSOV1Net: A Cone- and Spatial-Opponent Primary Visual Cortex-Inspired Neural Network for Lightweight Salient Object Detection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Salient object-detection models attempt to mimic the human visual system's ability to select relevant objects in images. To this end, the development of deep neural networks on high-end computers has recently achieved high performance. However, developing deep neural network models with the same performance for resource-limited vision sensors or mobile devices remains a challenge. In this work, we propose CoSOV1net, a novel lightweight salient object-detection neural network model, inspired by the cone- and spatial-opponent processes of the primary visual cortex (V1), which inextricably link color and shape in human color perception. Our proposed model is trained from scratch, without using backbones from image classification or other tasks. Experiments on the most widely used and challenging datasets for salient object detection show that CoSOV1Net achieves competitive performance (i.e., Fβ=0.931 on the ECSSD dataset) with state-of-the-art salient object-detection models while having a low number of parameters (1.14 M), low FLOPS (1.4 G) and high FPS (211.2) on GPU (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) compared to the state of the art in lightweight or nonlightweight salient object-detection tasks. Thus, CoSOV1net has turned out to be a lightweight salient object-detection model that can be adapted to mobile environments and resource-constrained devices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".