MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4384565508 · doi:10.14447/jnmes.v26i2.a09

SrTiO3 Perovskite-Based Coating on AZ31 Alloy and its Characterization

2023· article· en· W4384565508 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yogeswaran Mohan, S. Parameswari, P. Karpagavinayagam, S. Thanikaikarasan, C. Vedhi, A. Cyril

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of New Materials for Electrochemical Systems · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicThermal Expansion and Ionic Conductivity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceCharacterization (materials science)CoatingPerovskite (structure)AlloyMetallurgyComposite materialChemistryNanotechnologyCrystallography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Herein, the nanoparticles of SrTiO 3 perovskite oxide were synthesized using simple hydrothermal process.The synthesized perovskite oxide material was characterized by XRD and FTIR techniques.The XRD analysis reveals that the formed SrTiO 3 perovskite oxide in cubic crystal phase with high phase purity.The FTIR result demonstrate the stretching and vibration bands of Ti-O and Sr-O along with O-H functional groups.The SrTiO 3 perovskite oxide powder was added to silicone resin and the paste was applied on AZ31 alloy sample, which was then used for electrochemical analysis.The corrosion characteristics of SrTiO 3 perovskite oxide coating over AZ31 alloy were investigated in 7 % NaCl electrolyte, wherein platinum foil used as counter electrode, saturated calomel electrode (SCE) as reference and SrTiO 3 perovskite oxide coated AZ31 alloy as working electrode.The results reveal that the open circuit potential of AZ31 alloy shifted from -1.57V (SCE) to -0.95 V (SCE).The corrosion rates of bare AZ31 alloy calculated and found as 7 x 10 -2 mA/cm 2 , while the same after coating was measured as 9 x 10 -6 mA/cm 2 .The electrochemical impedance results also reveal that corrosion protection induced by the coating.Hence, it is summarized that the SrTiO 3 perovskite oxide coating demonstrated improved corrosion resistance for AZ31 alloy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.484

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of New Materials for Electrochemical SystemsSame topicThermal Expansion and Ionic ConductivityFrench-language works237,207