AN EXAMINATION OF 2SLGBTQIA+ PSYCHOLOGICAL WELLBEING IN CANADA AND THE UNITED STATES
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Compared to the general population, members of the 2SLGBTQIA+ community demonstrate lower mental health, psychological wellbeing, and life satisfaction (Conlin et al., 2019).An online questionnaire was administered to 534 participants across Canada (59.5%) and the United States (40.5%) to assess psychological wellbeing across sexual orientation and gender identity.Respondents were separated into four distinct categories to identify group differences: sexual minority (44.6%), gender minority (4.5%), double minority (sexual + gender minority; 26%), and non-minority (24.9%).A series of Chi-square tests and analyses of variance (ANOVA) were used to identify differences across groups and region.2SLGBTQIA+ participants reported significantly higher anxiety, depression, and loneliness (family, social) as well as lower life satisfaction than non-2SLGBTQIA+ participants.Further, significant group differences were found on some psychosocial measures; for example, double minority participants reported the lowest satisfaction with life and highest family loneliness relative to both sexual and non-minority categories.Overall, there were no differences between 2SLGBTQIA+ participants in Canada and the United States.Results demonstrate the continued disparity between 2SLGBTQIA+ and non-2SLGBTQIA+ populations in psychological wellbeing, with some poorer outcomes for double minority participants and limited differences between 2SLGBTQIA+ participants in Canada and the United States.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".