Enhancing family nursing practice: The effect of a supportive-educational programme on the family nursing practice, family satisfaction and family perceived support in the intensive care unit
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AMA Siyah Sangi M, Nabavi FH, Heidarian Miri H, Marvi Langari M, Abadi F. Enhancing family nursing practice: The effect of a supportive-educational programme on the family nursing practice, family satisfaction and family perceived support in the intensive care unit. Family Medicine & Primary Care Review. 2023;25(2):121-127. doi:10.5114/fmpcr.2023.127678. APA Siyah Sangi, M., Nabavi, F. H., Heidarian Miri, H., Marvi Langari, M., & Abadi, F. (2023). Enhancing family nursing practice: The effect of a supportive-educational programme on the family nursing practice, family satisfaction and family perceived support in the intensive care unit. Family Medicine & Primary Care Review, 25(2), 121-127. https://doi.org/10.5114/fmpcr.2023.127678 Chicago Siyah Sangi, Mostafa Abbasi, Fatemeh H Nabavi, Hamid Heidarian Miri, Maliheh Nekouei Marvi Langari, and Fatemeh, Haji Abadi. 2023. "Enhancing family nursing practice: The effect of a supportive-educational programme on the family nursing practice, family satisfaction and family perceived support in the intensive care unit". Family Medicine & Primary Care Review 25 (2): 121-127. doi:10.5114/fmpcr.2023.127678. Harvard Siyah Sangi, M., Nabavi, F., Heidarian Miri, H., Marvi Langari, M., and Abadi, F. (2023). Enhancing family nursing practice: The effect of a supportive-educational programme on the family nursing practice, family satisfaction and family perceived support in the intensive care unit. Family Medicine & Primary Care Review, 25(2), pp.121-127. https://doi.org/10.5114/fmpcr.2023.127678 MLA Siyah Sangi, Mostafa Abbasi et al. "Enhancing family nursing practice: The effect of a supportive-educational programme on the family nursing practice, family satisfaction and family perceived support in the intensive care unit." Family Medicine & Primary Care Review, vol. 25, no. 2, 2023, pp. 121-127. doi:10.5114/fmpcr.2023.127678. Vancouver Siyah Sangi M, Nabavi F, Heidarian Miri H, Marvi Langari M, Abadi F. Enhancing family nursing practice: The effect of a supportive-educational programme on the family nursing practice, family satisfaction and family perceived support in the intensive care unit. Family Medicine & Primary Care Review. 2023;25(2):121-127. doi:10.5114/fmpcr.2023.127678.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.032 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".