MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4384616291 · doi:10.23952/jano.5.2023.2.02

Model predictive control of discrete-time linear systems by ADMM with applications to turbofan engine control problems

2023· article· en· W4384616291 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jiao Teng, Xian Du, Lei Wang, Xinwei Wang, Junmei Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied and Numerical Optimization · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsTurbofanModel predictive controlQuadratic programmingComputer scienceMathematical optimizationQuadratic equationControl theory (sociology)Optimal controlLinear programmingOptimization problemControl (management)MathematicsEngineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we consider optimal control problems with linear discrete state space model, which originate from a class of turbofan engines.The optimization problem associated with each moving horizon estimation (MHE) in classical model predictive control (MPC) is a quadratic programming (QP) problem, and the general QP algorithms does not exploit the structural features of the turbofan engine itself to improve the computational efficiency of the algorithm.In the framework of model predictive control, the turbofan engine model makes the rolling optimization subproblem exhibit a sparse structure.Based on this feature, the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) is employed to solve each optimization sub-problem and design an improved MPC-ADMM algorithm for solving this class of optimal control problems.The simulation results are compared with the MPC-QP algorithm by numerical examples to show the effectiveness and superiority of the novel algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.969
Threshold uncertainty score0.675

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied and Numerical OptimizationSame topicAdvanced Control Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207