MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A large ‘Active Magnetic Shield’ for a high-precision experiment

2023· article· en· W4384652291 on OpenAlexaff
C. Abel, N. J. Ayres, G. Ban, G. Bison, K. Bodek, В. М. Бондар, T. Bouillaud, E. Chanel, J. Chen, Wangchun Chen, P.-J. Chiu, C. B. Crawford, M. Daum, C. B. Doorenbos, S. Emmenegger, L. Ferraris-Bouchez, M. Fertl, Anastasio Fratangelo, W. C. Griffith, Z. D. Grujić, Philip Harris, K. Kirch, V. Kletzl, P. Koss, J. Krempel, B. Lauss, T. Lefort, P. S. Mullan, O. Naviliat-Cuncic, D. Pais, F. M. Piegsa, G. Pignol, M. Rawlik, I. Rienäcker, D. Ries, S. Roccia, D. Rozpedzik, W. Saenz-Arevalo, P. Schmidt-Wellenburg, A. Schnabel, N. Severijns, Taylor Shelton, K. Svirina, R. Tavakoli Dinani, Jacob Thorne, R. Virot, N. Yazdandoost, J. Zejma, N. Ziehl, G. Zsigmond

Bibliographic record

VenueThe European Physical Journal C · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Subatomic Physics Research
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Particle Physics
FundersDirectorate for Mathematical and Physical SciencesScience and Technology Facilities CouncilVlaamse regeringMinistarstvo Prosvete, Nauke i Tehnološkog RazvojaSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungUniversity of SussexSigma XiaDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftInstitute of Physics BelgradeNational Science Foundation
KeywordsElectromagnetic shieldingNeutron electric dipole momentShieldShielded cableMagnetic dipoleDipoleMagnetic fieldSensitivity (control systems)Compensation (psychology)PhysicsGridComputational physicsStability (learning theory)Range (aeronautics)Electrical engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringAerospace engineeringElectronic engineeringElectric dipole momentGeometryMathematicsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We present a novel Active Magnetic Shield (AMS), designed and implemented for the n2EDM experiment at the Paul Scherrer Institute. The experiment will perform a high-sensitivity search for the electric dipole moment of the neutron. Magnetic-field stability and control is of key importance for n2EDM. A large, cubic, 5 m side length, magnetically shielded room (MSR) provides a passive, quasi-static shielding-factor of about $$10^5$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msup> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> <mml:mn>5</mml:mn> </mml:msup> </mml:math> for its inner sensitive volume. The AMS consists of a system of eight complex, feedback-controlled compensation coils constructed on an irregular grid spanned on a volume of less than 1000 m $$^3$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow/> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> </mml:msup> </mml:math> around the MSR. The AMS is designed to provide a stable and uniform magnetic-field environment around the MSR, while being reasonably compact. The system can compensate static and variable magnetic fields up to $$\pm \, 50 \, {\upmu }\hbox {T}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>±</mml:mo> <mml:mspace/> <mml:mn>50</mml:mn> <mml:mspace/> <mml:mi>μ</mml:mi> <mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> (homogeneous components) and $$\pm \, 5 \, {\upmu }\hbox {T/m}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>±</mml:mo> <mml:mspace/> <mml:mn>5</mml:mn> <mml:mspace/> <mml:mi>μ</mml:mi> <mml:mtext>T/m</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> (first-order gradients), suppressing them to a few $${\upmu }\hbox {T}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>μ</mml:mi> <mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> in the sub-Hertz frequency range. The presented design concept and implementation of the AMS fulfills the requirements of the n2EDM experiment and can be useful for other applications, where magnetically silent environments are important and spatial constraints inhibit simpler geometrical solutions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.895
Threshold uncertainty score0.967

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe European Physical Journal CSame topicAtomic and Subatomic Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207