A New Two-dimensional Dual-permeability Model of Preferential Water Flow in the Vadose Zone
Bibliographic record
Abstract
LEAK2D (L2D) is a new, two-dimensional, dual-permeability model for the simulation of preferential water flow in the vadose zone, allowing for the continuous exchange of water between the matrix and the fracture domain. It is based on the two-dimensional Richards equation for the simulation of flow in the matrix domain and on the kinematic wave equation for the simulation of flow in the fracture domain. The Richards equation is solved by a combination of the Alternating Direction Implicit method and the Douglas-Jones predictor-corrector method. This combination leads to a very efficient, stable, and time-consuming method. A variable time step is used by which any instability of the numerical solution is avoided. The water transfer from the fracture to the matrix domain is estimated as a first-order approximation of the water diffusion equation. The model was used to satisfactorily simulate preferential flow under an extreme rainfall/irrigation event. The exchange of water between the two domains depends on parameters which have physical meaning; however, their exact values are difficult to be determined or measured. Based on the most common values of these parameters found in the literature, a sensitivity analysis was performed to define their effect on the output of the model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".