Diversity and Evolutionary History of Ti Plasmids of “tumorigenes” Clade of <i>Rhizobium</i> spp. and Their Differentiation from Other Ti and Ri Plasmids
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Agrobacteria are important plant pathogens responsible for crown/cane gall and hairy root diseases. Crown/cane gall disease is associated with strains carrying tumor-inducing (Ti) plasmids, while hairy root disease is caused by strains harboring root-inducing (Ri) plasmids. In this study, we analyzed the sequences of Ti plasmids of the novel "tumorigenes" clade of the family Rhizobiaceae ("tumorigenes" Ti plasmids), which includes two species, Rhizobium tumorigenes and Rhizobium rhododendri. The sequences of reference Ti/Ri plasmids were also included, which was followed by a comparative analysis of their backbone and accessory regions. The "tumorigenes" Ti plasmids have novel opine signatures compared with other Ti/Ri plasmids characterized so far. The first group exemplified by pTi1078 is associated with production of agrocinopine, nopaline, and ridéopine in plant tumors, while the second group comprising pTi6.2 is responsible for synthesis of leucinopine. Bioinformatic and chemical analyses, including opine utilization assays, indicated that leucinopine associated with pTi6.2 most likely has D,L stereochemistry, unlike the L,L-leucinopine produced in tumors induced by reference strains Chry5 and Bo542. Most of the "tumorigenes" Ti plasmids have conjugative transfer system genes that are unusual for Ti plasmids, composed of avhD4/avhB and traA/mobC/parA regions. Next, our results suggested that "tumorigenes" Ti plasmids have a common origin, but they diverged through large-scale recombination events, through recombination with single or multiple distinct Ti/Ri plasmids. Lastly, we showed that Ti/Ri plasmids could be differentiated based on pairwise Mash or average amino-acid identity distance clustering, and we supply a script to facilitate application of the former approach by other researchers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".