Neoproterozoic Diamictites of the Middle Tianshan, Kyrgyzstan: Age, Depositional Environments and Provenance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The Upper Precambrian section in the Sandalash, Talas, and Chatkal ranges are studied to refine the age and genesis of Neoproterozoic diamictites of the Middle Tianshan. The results of detrital zircon dating show that diamictites were deposited in the Cryogenian and Ediacaran. The diamictites in the lower part of the Shorashu Formation comprise tillites, which were likely deposited at the end of the Cryogenian during the Marino glaciation (~640–635 Ma). In the upper part of the Shorashu Formation, the diamictites represent debris flows and grain flows associated with turbidites and, apparently, have nonglacial origin; their age is no older than the Early Ediacaran 616 ± 7 Ma. The pinching out of the Shorashu Formation to the north and the predominantly southerly directions of sediment transport in turbidites indicate that a non-depositional uplift located north of the basin. The distribution of detrital zircon ages in the studied samples are characterized by the main peaks within the ranges of 700–800 and 1800–1900 Ma and subordinate peaks at 2400–2500 Ma and are almost identical to the distributions of ages in the Proterozoic sedimentary rocks of the Tarim Craton. The comparison of the studied sequences with the sections of the Kuruktag Range in the northeastern Tarim Craton suggests that the diamictites of the lower part of the Shorashu Formation are analogs of the Tereeken tillite, which deposited at the end of the Cryogenian, whereas the slope facies of the upper part of the section are correlated with turbidites of the Zhamokti and Yukkengol formations of the early Ediacaran.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".