MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4384666377 · doi:10.34133/space.0057

Dynamic Modeling and Analysis of Electrodynamic Multi-tether System

2023· article· en· W4384666377 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSpace Science & Technology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSpace Satellite Systems and Control
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPropellantCurrent (fluid)CollisionLibration (molecule)Aerospace engineeringVibrationSystem dynamicsComputer sciencePhysicsSpace debrisControl theory (sociology)SimulationMechanicsEngineeringSpacecraftControl (management)MathematicsAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electrodynamic tether (EDT) is a key prospective technique for space-debris removal without the use of propellant. However, there are 2 main shortcomings of the classical EDT system. One is that the conductive tether with a single wire should exceed several kilometers to produce the expected force, which increases the risk of collision and damage. The other is the heavy current or high voltage caused by the overlong tether, which may even melt itself. Therefore, a novel electrodynamic multi-tether (EMT) system has been proposed here to overcome the above disadvantages of the classical EDT system. The EMT system has multi tethers connecting the 2 end bodies, which has more complex dynamic behaviors than the EDT system. In order to promote the application of the EMT system, this paper will pay attention to the dynamic modeling and analysis of the EMT system, to reveal the primary dynamic characteristics. Firstly, the dynamic equation of the novel EMT system was established. Secondly, the linear assumption and vibration theory were utilized to illustrate its primary dynamic characteristic. Finally, the expressions of the vibration period and critical current of tether were given and numerical simulations were conducted to verify these analyses. The results showed that the tether libration equation can be simplified when the size of main satellite is much smaller than that of tether. Besides, the tether will go tumbling immediately when the practical current exceeds the critical current.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.457
Threshold uncertainty score0.506

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.009
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it