MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4384695574 · doi:10.22215/etd/2023-15536

Efficient DEVS Simulations Design on Heterogeneous Platforms

2023· dissertation· en· W4384695574 on OpenAlexaff
Guillermo G. Trabes

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicSimulation Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersUniversidad Nacional de San Luis
KeywordsDEVSComputer scienceReuseFormalism (music)Multi-core processorDiscrete event simulationBenchmark (surveying)ComputationDistributed computingParallel computingModeling and simulationComputer engineeringProgramming languageSimulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Modeling and Simulation (M&S) has become an essential tool in science and engineering due to its ability to represent problems in various disciplines and conduct scientific explorations. To define solutions based on M&S it is important to have formal definitions for the models. In this way, we can define the models with precision, as well as verify and reuse them. The Discrete Event System Specification (DEVS) formalism provides a theoretical formalism for developing M&S based on discrete events. While we can use DEVS to define models precisely, an issue with M&S is that the simulation of complex problems generally requires a significant number of computations, and this leads to large execution times. In addition, deploying simulations in parallel computers presents an additional challenge, the energy high-performance computers need to operate. To address these issues, we propose a methodology to execute DEVS simulation efficiently in modern parallel computer architectures. Our approach provides a simple and error-free method that improves previous approaches by allowing additional parallelism. We propose novel algorithms aimed for multicore computers, and heterogeneous platforms composed by multicore and GPU architectures in the same system. To evaluate our methodology, we provide an extensive performance analysis over a synthetic benchmark and a real-world problem. Our experimental results show how our approach allows us to accelerate simulations up to 32.9 times. We also analyze the energy consumption required by parallel computers to execute simulations. The amount of energy consumed depends on both the execution time and the power used by the hardware. Power is defined as the amount of energy consumed per unit of time. Our experimental findings demonstrate that while parallel execution consumes more power this can ultimately lead to energy reductions by allowing simulations to complete faster. Finally, we investigated the application of the Dynamic Voltage and Frequency Scaling (DVFS) technique on our parallel algorithms. Our results showed that certain configurations of DVFS can lead to reduced power and energy consumption, however, this comes at the expense of time performance. Overall, our evaluation highlights that the best frequency configuration depends on which metric we try to improve.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.204
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.219
GPT teacher head0.455
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSimulation Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207