Studi Penanganan Jalan Amblas di Desa Sumbernanas, Kecamatan Gedangan, Kabupaten Malang
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Telah terjadi tanah longsor di dusun Sumbernanas Kecamatan Gedangan Kabupaten Malang. Peristiwa menyebabkan jalan amblas sepanjang 50 m pada ruas jalan Gedangan–Gondanglegi sedalam 3 m. Berbagai usaha telah dilakukan pengurugan pada lokasi tersebut, tetapi tidak menghasilkan kondisi yang diharapkan. Penelitian bertujuan untuk menganalisis penyebab jalan amblas dan menentukan metode penanganannya. Metode penelitian meliputi observasi lapangan, studi literatur geologi kawasan, pengukuran topografi, penyelidikan tanah in-situ, pengolahan data dan analisis, dan desain penanganan. Parameter desain ditentukan secara perhitungan-balik analisis kestablian lereng pada saat runtuh. Hasil analisis mengindikasikan bahwa jalan amblas disebabkan oleh kombinasi terikisnya bantaran alur sungai dan pelunakan tanah akibat dari infiltrasi aliran air bawah tanah. Desain penanganan yang diusulkan adalah pemasangan konstruksi gabion sebagai dinding penahan tanah. Perhitungan struktur menunjukan konstruksi yang diusulkan memberikan faktor keamanan FK > 1,5 untuk jangka pendek dan FK >1,1 pada saat gempa.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".