Enhancing Physician Assistant Psychiatry Interviewing Skills Using Standardized Patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this pilot study was to assess whether supplemental psychiatry training in the didactic year increases the scores on the Physician Assistant Education Association (PAEA) Psychiatry and Behavioral Health End of Rotation examination and psychiatry preceptor evaluation. METHODS: Data were obtained from the physician assistant (PA) students on PAEA Psychiatry and Behavioral Health End of Rotation examination and psychiatry preceptor evaluation for a single institution. Then, a comparison was performed for PA students who did not participate in supplemental psychiatry/behavioral health training (Cohort 1/historical control group; n = 62) and PA students who participated in supplemental psychiatric and behavioral health training (Cohort 2/experimental group; n = 63) to determine the effects of the groups. RESULTS: An independent t test demonstrated that the experimental group performed significantly better than the control group on both the Psychiatry and Behavioral Health PAEA End of Rotation examination and preceptor evaluation {control group (M = 83.4) and experimental group (M = 86.3; t [117] = 2.8; P < .05)} and the preceptor evaluation {control group (M = 90) and experimental group (M = 92.6; t [112] = 2.1; P < .05)}. In addition, both analyses demonstrated a moderate effect size (End of Rotation examination, d = 0.51; preceptor, d = 0.62). A multiple regression analysis was used to control for age, sex, grade point average (GPA), and training intervention. Age, sex, and GPA were found not to affect the results. However, treatment intervention was statistically significant for both the End of Rotation examination and preceptor evaluation scores. DISCUSSION: Supplemental training in behavioral health and psychiatry, which included a standardized patient encounter and an interactive session dedicated to psychiatry interviewing techniques, resulted in students performing better on the Psychiatry and Behavioral Health PAEA End of Rotation examination and preceptor evaluation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".