MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4384818571 · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06413-w

Carbonaceous dust grains seen in the first billion years of cosmic time

2023· article· en· W4384818571 on OpenAlexaff
Joris Witstok, Irene Shivaei, Renske Smit, R. Maiolino, Stefano Carniani, Emma Curtis-Lake, Pierre Ferruit, Santiago Arribas, Andrew J. Bunker, Alex J. Cameron, S. Charlot, Jacopo Chevallard, Mirko Curti, Anna de Graaff, Francesco D’Eugenio, Giovanna Giardino, Tobias J. Looser, Tim Rawle, Bruno Rodríguez Del Pino, Chris J. Willott, Stacey Alberts, William Baker, Kristan Boyett, Eiichi Egami, Daniel J. Eisenstein, Ryan Endsley, Kevin Hainline, Zhiyuan Ji, Benjamin D. Johnson, Nimisha Kumari, Jianwei Lyu, Erica J. Nelson, Michele Perna, Marcia Rieke, Brant Robertson, Lester Sandles, Aayush Saxena, Jan Scholtz, Fengwu Sun, Sandro Tacchella, Christina C. Williams, Christopher N. A. Willmer

Bibliographic record

VenueNature · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsHerzberg Institute of Astrophysics
FundersScience and Technology Facilities CouncilAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónGoddard Space Flight CenterNational Science FoundationFondation MeracMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónLiverpool John Moores UniversityEuropean CommissionUniversity of California, Santa CruzSpace Telescope Science InstituteComunidad de MadridNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationNuclear Safety and Security CommissionUK Research and Innovation
KeywordsCOSMIC cancer databaseBillion yearsCosmic rayEnvironmental scienceCosmic dustAstrobiologyPhysicsAstronomyAstrophysicsAtmospheric sciencesGalaxy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Large dust reservoirs (up to approximately 10 8 M ⊙ ) have been detected 1–3 in galaxies out to redshift z ≃ 8, when the age of the Universe was only about 600 Myr. Generating substantial amounts of dust within such a short timescale has proven challenging for theories of dust formation 4,5 and has prompted the revision of the modelling of potential sites of dust production 6–8 , such as the atmospheres of asymptotic giant branch stars in low-metallicity environments, supernova ejecta and the accelerated growth of grains in the interstellar medium. However, degeneracies between different evolutionary pathways remain when the total dust mass of galaxies is the only available observable. Here we report observations of the 2,175 Å dust attenuation feature, which is well known in the Milky Way and galaxies at z ≲ 3 (refs. 9–11 ), in the near-infrared spectra of galaxies up to z ≃ 7, corresponding to the first billion years of cosmic time. The relatively short timescale implied for the formation of carbonaceous grains giving rise to this feature 12 suggests a rapid production process, possibly in Wolf–Rayet stars or supernova ejecta.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.568
Threshold uncertainty score0.177

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations91
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNatureSame topicAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesFrench-language works237,207