Natural History and Phenotypic Spectrum of <scp>GAA‐<i>FGF14</i></scp> Sporadic Late‐Onset Cerebellar Ataxia (<scp>SCA27B</scp>)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Heterozygous GAA expansions in the FGF14 gene have been related to autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia (SCA27B-MIM:620174). Whether they represent a common cause of sporadic late-onset cerebellar ataxia (SLOCA) remains to be established. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the prevalence, characterize the phenotypic spectrum, identify discriminative features, and model longitudinal progression of SCA27B in a prospective cohort of SLOCA patients. METHODS: FGF14 expansions screening combined with longitudinal deep-phenotyping in a prospective cohort of 118 SLOCA patients (onset >40 years of age, no family history of cerebellar ataxia) without a definite diagnosis. RESULTS: Prevalence of SCA27B was 12.7% (15/118). Higher age of onset, higher Spinocerebellar Degeneration Functional Score, presence of vertigo, diplopia, nystagmus, orthostatic hypotension absence, and sensorimotor neuropathy were significantly associated with SCA27B. Ataxia progression was ≈0.4 points per year on the Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia. CONCLUSIONS: FGF14 expansion is a major cause of SLOCA. Our natural history data will inform future FGF14 clinical trials. © 2023 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".