Association of Successful Percutaneous Revascularization of Chronic Total Occlusions With Quality of Life
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Importance: Chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention (CTO-PCI) is not usually offered because of skepticism about long-term clinical benefits. Objective: To assess the association of successful CTO-PCI with quality of life by analyzing the relevant domains of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ). Data Sources: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases were searched to identify randomized trials and observational studies specifically addressing quality of life domains of SAQ from January 2010 to June 2022. Study Selection: Studies included reporting SAQ metrics such as angina frequency, physical limitation, and quality of life, before and after CTO-PCI. Data Extraction and Synthesis: The present study was performed according to the Cochrane Collaboration and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statements, in which fixed-effect or random-effect models with generic inverse-variance weighting depending on statistical homogeneity were applied. Data were extracted by 3 independent reviewers. Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was angina frequency; physical limitation and quality of life were assessed as secondary outcomes. Results: Seven prospective randomized or observational studies (2500 patients) were included, with a mean (SD) participant age of 61.2 (2.1) years. CTO-PCI was associated with significantly improved quality-of-life metrics during a mean (SD) follow-up of 14.8 (16.3) months. In patients with successful procedures, angina episodes became less frequent (mean [SD] difference for SAQ angina frequency of 12.9 [3.1] survey points [95% CI, 7.1-19.8 survey points]; standardized mean difference was 0.54 [95% CI, 0.21-0.92]; P = .002; I2 = 86.4%) and they experienced less physical activity limitation (mean [SD] difference for SAQ physical limitation of 9.7 [6.2] survey points [95% CI, 3.5-16.2 survey points]; standardized mean difference was 0.42 [95% CI, 0.24-0.55]; P < .001; I2 = 20.9%), and greater quality-of-life domain (mean [SD] difference for SAQ quality of life of 14.9 [3.5] survey points [95% CI, 7.7-22.5 survey points]; standardized mean difference was 0.41 [95% CI, 0.25-0.61]; P < .001; I2 = 58.8%) compared with patients with optimal medical therapy or failed procedure. Furthermore, follow-up duration (point estimate, 0.03; 95% CI, 0.01-0.04; P = .01) was associated with a significant decrease in angina frequency in meta-regression analysis. Conclusions and Relevance: In this systematic review and meta-analysis examining quality of life following CTO-PCI, successful procedures were associated with improved quality-of-life parameters compared with patients on optimal medical therapy or after failed CTO-PCI. These findings suggest support for using PCI to treat CTOs in symptomatic patients unresponsive to medical treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.014 | 0.067 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".