MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4384828407 · doi:10.14232/phd.11171

On subuniverses of lattices and semilattices

2022· dissertation· en· W4384828407 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Delbrin Ahmed

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Algebra and Logic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLattice (music)Von Neumann architectureMathematicsAlgebra over a fieldPolymathArt historyPure mathematicsPhysicsHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

puter scientist, engineer and polymath.Von Neumann is generally regarded as the foremost mathematician of his time and is said to be the last representative of the great mathematicians (see [39]).He integrated pure and applied sciences.Notions like von Neumann algebra, prizes and https://njszt.hu/hu are named after him.His excellence also manifested itself in lattice theory, and his work substantially contributed to the fact that lattice theory eventually became a separate branch of mathematics.The founder of lattice theory and Universal Algebra, Garrett Birkhoff himself wrote in [9] that "'John von Neumann's brilliant mind blazed over lattice theory like a meteor, during a brief period centering around 1935-1937."' and "'One wonders what would have been the effect on lattice theory, if von Neumann's intense two-year preoccupation with lattice theory had continued for twenty years!"'Another milestone in the history of lattice theory was the year 1971, when the first journal devoted to lattices was founded.This journal called Algebra Universalis is still going strong.Well, it is also devoted to universal algebra not just lattice theory, but these two branches have a lot in common at the topical level and personal level.The founder, George Grätzer, is famous for producing results, papers and monographs on lattice theory; his 61-times coauthor, Elégius Tamás Schmidt also deserves a mention.Within a Ph.D. thesis, we cannot hope to give a reasonable survey of what transpired in lattice theory after the progress made by Birkhoff and John von Neumann.Instead of doing so, the reader is referred to the paper Rota [45], and to introductory sections of the monographs Grätzer [33] and Roman [44].In addition to the above-mentioned lattice theorist Grätzer (Hungarian-Canadian) and Schmidt (Hungarian), it is worth mentioning that Hungarian lattice theorists Gábor Szász, András Huhn, Gábor Czédli and Sándor Radeleczki have made substantial contributions and have had a huge impact on this branch of mathematics with their researches.In the rest of our introduction, we restrict our attention to those results that directly motivated our work and are closely connected to it.In recent years, intensive research has been carried out on finite lattices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.192
Threshold uncertainty score0.356

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Algebra and LogicFrench-language works237,207