Experimental Synthesis of the Rare-Earth Fluoride Gagarinite-(Ce) by Fluid-Induced Alteration of Chevkinite-(Ce)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Gagarinite-(Ce) [Na(Ca,Ce)2F6] has been synthesized as a product in experiments designed to examine the fluid-induced alteration of chevkinite-(Ce). The experiments were conducted at 600 °C and 400 MPa for 21 days and at 550 °C and 200 MPa for 63 days. At 600 °C, a rim of gagarinite-(Ce) was seen to develop around chevkinite-(Ce), which was itself enclosed in a glassy, amorphous material containing inclusions of albite. At 550 °C, the chevkinite-(Ce) was observed to be surrounded by a rim of gagarinite-(Ce) and fluorbritholite-(Ce), which in turn was enclosed in massive narsarsukite with inclusions of albite. This assemblage was associated with a sodic pyroxene. In the 550 °C run both rims with gagarinite-(Ce) were subsequently overgrown by both Ce-bearing frankdicksonite and a lamprophyllite group mineral identified as delindeite. Electron probe microanalyses are given of all reactant phases. The stability conditions of gagarinite-(Ce) are in accord with those inferred from the only natural occurrence, Strange Lake, Canada. The formation of gagarinite-(Ce) is ascribed to NaF being the only component added in the experiments, resulting in a very high Na/Ca ratio in the system. New parageneses for narsarsukite, frankdicksonite, and delindeite are reported.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".