MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4384835030 · doi:10.3749/2300005

Driekopite, Ideally PtBi, a New Mineral Species from the Driekop Platinum Pipe, Republic of South Africa

2023· article· en· W4384835030 on OpenAlexaff
Andrew M. McDonald, Louis J. Cabri, Nobumichi Tamura, Frank Melcher, Anna Vymazalová

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Mineralogy and Petrology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsQueen Elizabeth II Health Sciences CentreLaurentian University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsostructuralPleochroismCrystallographyOsmiumPlatinum groupCrystal structurePlatinumChemistryMineralMineralogyMaterials scienceMetallurgyCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The new mineral driekopite, ideally PtBi, was found in a concentrate from the Driekop mine, one of three zoned Pt pipes (mined from 1925 to 1930) that crosscut the layered mafic and ultramafic sequences of the eastern Bushveld Complex, Republic of South Africa. The holotype grain of driekopite (∼ 22 × 13 μm) occurs in a complex, rounded aggregate ∼120 μm in diameter, in association with isoferroplatinum (Pt3Fe), hollingworthite (RhAsS), geversite (PtSb2), insizwaite (PtBi2), andrieslombaardite (RhSbS), stibiopalladinite (Pd5Sb2), sobolevskite (PdBi), possible tatyanaite (Pt9Cu3Sn4), osmium-bearing tulameenite (Pt2FeCu), and Pt-Fe alloy (∼Pt2Fe). Driekopite appears slightly orange under reflected light compared to Pt-Fe alloys. It shows moderate to strong bireflectance, varying from light yellow to brownish yellow, no pleochroism or internal reflections, and moderate to strong anisotropism. The empirical formula, calculated from the average of six wavelength-dispersive spectrometry analyses made on five grains, on the basis of two atoms, is (Pt0.68Pd0.31Fe0.01)Σ1.00(Bi0.53Sb0.43As0.02Sn0.02S0.01)Σ1.01. The mineral is hexagonal, space group P63/mmc (#194) with the refined unit-cell dimensions a = 4.1993(5), c = 5.6194(6) Å, V = 85.82 Å3, Z = 2, and Dcalc = 12.91 g/cm3. Driekopite is isostructural with NiAs, with mixed compositions of Pt and Pd at the 2a site (0.55:0.45, respectively) and Bi and Sb at the 2c site (0.63:0.37, respectively). Its crystal structure was refined to wR = 6.3% using 13 unique Laue reflections obtained using synchrotron radiation. The six strongest lines for the powder X-ray diffraction pattern calculated from the crystal structure refined from synchrotron data is [d in Å (I) (hkl)]: 3.0531 (92) (101), 2.2234 (100) (102), 2.0997 (77) , 1.5266 (28) (202), 1.2347 (24) , 1.1676 (18) . The holotype grain of driekopite is observed to be paragenetically later than isoferroplatinum and hollingworthite and is considered to be synformational with Bi-bearing geversite, insizwaite, andrieslombaardite, and sobolevskite. The entire aggregate containing these platinum-group minerals is overgrown by a rim of tulameenite and Pt-Fe alloy (∼Pt2Fe), indicating they are paragenetically the last minerals to form. Experiments designed to synthesize PtBi over the range of 200 to 500 °C were all successful. Synthetic PtBi melts congruently at 765 °C, suggesting that driekopite likely crystallized at sub-magmatic temperatures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.560
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Mineralogy and PetrologySame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207