MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4384935140 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3151344/v1

Health Outcomes in Postmenopausal Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome History: Systematic review and meta-analysis

2023· preprint· en· W4384935140 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Han Wu, Lina Fan, Lixia Sun, Haoran Wang, Mengchen Liu, Xianchang Sun, Wenjuan Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOvarian function and disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Shandong ProvinceHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaEuropean Commission
KeywordsPolycystic ovaryMedicineBody mass indexMeta-analysisOdds ratioConfidence intervalWaistGynecologyObstetricsCochrane LibraryObesityInternal medicineInsulin resistance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Backgrounds Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is one of the most common reproductive and endocrine diseases that can impact a woman's health status throughout her life. Concerns have always been focused on women at adolescent or reproductive age, however the outcomes of PCOS occurring at their postmenopausal age have not been clarified. Methods We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to identify the association between health outcomes of postmenopausal women and their experiences of PCOS. The relevant literature was searched from Embase databases, Cochrane Library and PubMed. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). The weighted mean differences (WMDs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of relevant health parameters were calculated between postmenopausal women with PCOS history and the healthy controls. Pooled odds ratio (OR) was used to evaluate the association between PCOS and specific health outcome. Results Our study included 15 studies with 757 postmenopausal women with history of PCOS and 4211 controls. Compared to the controls, the following parameters were significantly higher among postmenopausal women with PCOS history: body mass index (BMI) (WMD = 3.28, 95%CI: 1.24 to 5.31, I2 = 96%, P = 0.002), waist circumference (WMD = 7.01, 95%CI: 3.24 to 10.78, I2 = 76%, P < 0.001), waist/hip ratio (WHR) (WMD = 0.03, 95%CI: 0.00 to 0.06, I2 = 93%, P = 0.030), triglycerides (WMD = 0.40, 95%CI: 0.04 to 0.77, I2 = 75%, P = 0.030), total testosterone (WMD = 0.16, 95%CI: 0.09 to 0.22, I2 = 51%, P < 0.001) and free androgen index (FAI) (WMD = 1.82, 95%CI: 1.05 to 2.59, I2 = 91%, P < 0.001). In addition, PCOS history was significantly associated with the outcomes of type 2 diabetes (OR = 4.09, 95%CI: 1.62 to 10.33, I2 = 72%, P = 0.003) and metabolic syndrome (OR = 3.93, 95%CI: 1.17 to 13.22, I2 = 67%, P = 0.030). Conclusions This study illustrated that women exposed to PCOS might have higher risk of health problems at their postmenopausal age. Our findings shed light on requirement of early intervention among women with PCOS, as well as targeted health supports to postmenopausal women who have a history of PCOS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.022
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.022
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0170.029
Bibliometrics0.0050.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.145
GPT teacher head0.404
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch SquareSame topicOvarian function and disordersFrench-language works237,207