Early Versus Late Repair of Incisional Hernia Following Laparostomy for Enter cutaneous Fistulas Using Component Separation Technique and Onlay Placement of Polypropylene Mesh
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: To compare the outcome of early versus late repair of incisional hernia that developed following laparostomy for enterocutaneous fistula. Material and methods: This Randomized controlled trial study was conducted at Surgical C unit, Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar from 22nd May, 2014 till 21st May, 2017. Following ethical approval, 69 patients were enrolled in the study, amongst which three were lost to follow-up. So, 33 patients in both groups were later on included. In group A, patients were asked to present at an early 3-month delay following confirmation of successful enterocutaneous fistula management after discharge, and Group B patients were asked to come one year later. Both groups were subjected to the same procedure of component separation technique with reinforcement with polypropylene mesh. Data was recorded on a Proforma and post-operative complications were mentioned for a period of 12 months that included seroma/hematoma formation, superficial wound infection, mesh infection, enterocutaneous fistulas, recurrence and mortality. Results: Following allocation to two groups, the group planned for surgery by the component separation technique (CST) in the early group had a slightly smaller hernia (21.3cm) but this was not significant a difference in comparison (p=0.68). The study was focused at a follow-up for duration for one year during which 19 patients (28.7%) in total had clinical or radiological evidence of recurrence of the incisional Hernia out of which ten patients(30.3%) were from group A. Recurrence in group B occurred in 9 patients(27.2%) (p=0.88) This included three patients (4.5%) from both groups with infected meshes that needed removal. Conclusion: Component Separation technique is a feasible staged approach to management of a ventral wall defect (incisional hernia) with reinforcement of the wall with polypropylene mesh in early phase of recovery after enterocutaneous fi stulas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".