MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385063856 · doi:10.1186/s13017-023-00509-4

Source control in emergency general surgery: WSES, GAIS, SIS-E, SIS-A guidelines

2023· review· en· W4385063856 on OpenAlexaff
Federico Coccolini, Massimo Sartelli, Robert G. Sawyer, Kemal Raşa, Bruno Viaggi, Fikri M. Abu‐Zidan, Kjetil Søreide, Timothy Craig Hardcastle, Deepak Gupta, Cino Bendinelli, Marco Ceresoli, Vishal G. Shelat, Richard P. G. ten Broek, Gian Luca Baiocchi, Ernest E. Moore, Ibrahima Sall, Mauro Podda, Luigi Bonavina, І. А. Кryvoruchko, Philip F. Stahel, Kenji Inaba, Philippe Montravers, Boris Sakakushev, Gabriele Sganga, Paolo Ballestracci, Manu L. N. G. Malbrain, Jean‐Louis Vincent, Manos Pikoulis, Solomon Gurmu Beka, Krstina Doklestić, Massimo Chiarugi, Marco Falcone, Elena Bignami, Viktor Reva, Zaza Demetrashvili, Salomone Di Saverio, Matti Tolonen, Pradeep H. Navsaria, Miklosh Bala, Zsolt J. Balogh, Andrey Litvin, Andreas Hecker, Imtiaz Wani, Andreas Fette, Belinda De Simone, Rao R. Ivatury, Edoardo Picetti, Vladimir Khokha, Edward Tan, Chad G. Ball, Carlo Tascini, Yunfeng Cui, Raúl Coimbra, Michael E. Kelly, Costanza Martino, Vanni Agnoletti, Marja A. Boermeester, Nicola de’Angelis, Mircea Chirica, Walt Biffl, Luca Ansaloni, Yoram Kluger, Fausto Catena, Andrew W. Kirkpatrick

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Journal of Emergency Surgery · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAppendicitis Diagnosis and Management
Canadian institutionsFoothills Medical Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIntensive care medicineSepsisInfection controlSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Intra-abdominal infections (IAI) are among the most common global healthcare challenges and they are usually precipitated by disruption to the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Their successful management typically requires intensive resource utilization, and despite the best therapies, morbidity and mortality remain high. One of the main issues required to appropriately treat IAI that differs from the other etiologies of sepsis is the frequent requirement to provide physical source control. Fortunately, dramatic advances have been made in this aspect of treatment. Historically, source control was left to surgeons only. With new technologies non-surgical less invasive interventional procedures have been introduced. Alternatively, in addition to formal surgery open abdomen techniques have long been proposed as aiding source control in severe intra-abdominal sepsis. It is ironic that while a lack or even delay regarding source control clearly associates with death, it is a concept that remains poorly described. For example, no conclusive definition of source control technique or even adequacy has been universally accepted. Practically, source control involves a complex definition encompassing several factors including the causative event, source of infection bacteria, local bacterial flora, patient condition, and his/her eventual comorbidities. With greater understanding of the systemic pathobiology of sepsis and the profound implications of the human microbiome, adequate source control is no longer only a surgical issue but one that requires a multidisciplinary, multimodality approach. Thus, while any breach in the GI tract must be controlled, source control should also attempt to control the generation and propagation of the systemic biomediators and dysbiotic influences on the microbiome that perpetuate multi-system organ failure and death. Given these increased complexities, the present paper represents the current opinions and recommendations for future research of the World Society of Emergency Surgery, of the Global Alliance for Infections in Surgery of Surgical Infection Society Europe and Surgical Infection Society America regarding the concepts and operational adequacy of source control in intra-abdominal infections.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.076

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0050.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.025

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.193
GPT teacher head0.412
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations76
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Journal of Emergency SurgerySame topicAppendicitis Diagnosis and ManagementFrench-language works237,207