The Use of Ovarian Vein Sampling to Lateralize a Virilizing Leydig Cell Ovarian Tumor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background/Objective: Leydig cell tumors are a rare androgen-secreting ovarian tumor. We present a patient with virilization symptoms secondary to a Leydig cell tumor, with nonrevealing imaging studies, that was localized using ovarian vein sampling (OVS). Case Report: A 56-year-old postmenopausal woman was referred by her gynecologist to the endocrinology clinic for voice-deepening, clitoral enlargement, scalp hair loss, and excessive body hair growth. Her total testosterone was 11.5 (0.3-1.3 nmol/L), bioavailable testosterone was 7.19 (0.1-0.6 nmol/L), and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate was 4.0 (0.8-4.9 μmol/L). Transvaginal ultrasound and abdominal magnetic resonance imaging showed no adrenal or ovarian masses bilaterally. On adrenal vein sampling (AVS) and OVS, total testosterone from the left gonadal vein was 780.0 (0.3-1.3 nmol/L) and right gonadal vein was 18.6 (0.3-1.3 nmol/L), with a left-to-right ovarian testosterone ratio of 41.94. A bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy was performed, and a 1.0 cm Leydig cell tumor in the left ovary was noted on histopathology. One month after surgery, her total and bioavailable testosterone were <0.4 (0.3-1.3 nmol/L and 0.1-0.6 nmol/L, respectively). At 6 months, she had normalization of her voice to baseline, decreased clitoral size, decreased hair growth on her back, and improvement in her male-pattern baldness. Discussion: OVS and AVS are useful diagnostic investigation tools in cases of virilization, in which imaging is nonrevealing. Our case supports previously suggested left-to-right ovarian vein testosterone ratio of ≥15 being associated with a left-sided tumor. Conclusion: Few cases have been published on the interpretation of AVS and OVS in the setting of virilization. Previously suggested ratios for lateralization were valid for this patient.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".