MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Founding of the culture collection of antibiotic-resistant strains of zoonotic bacteria in the Russian Federation

2023· article· en· W4385155120 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Olga Ivanova, Dmitry A. Blumenkrants, Ekaterina Krylova, I.V. Soltynskaya, Anastasia Goncharova, Evgeny Chaikin, Anna A. Akhmetzyanova, А. Н. Панин

Bibliographic record

VenueVeterinary World · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSecurity, Politics, and Digital Transformation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitute of GeneticsNational Research Center "Kurchatov Institute"Federal Agency for Scientific Organizations
KeywordsRussian federationMicrobiologyAntibioticsBacteriaBiologyVirologyAntibiotic resistanceGeographyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Aim: The main purpose of a national bioresource center is to standardize, centralize, preserve, and ensure accessibility of microbial bioresources that accumulate there because of state research programs. The establishment of national bioresource centers for antibiotic-resistant microorganisms allows to solve practical problems in the field of veterinary service, as well as to develop effective chemotherapeutic and disinfectant drugs to overcome the mechanisms of resistance. This study aimed to outline the process of forming a national culture collection of antibiotic-resistant strains of zoonotic bacteria in the Russian Federation using two microbial strains. Materials and Methods: The object of research was isolates of Salmonella spp., Escherichia coli, Enterococcus spp., Campylobacter spp., Listeria monocytogenes, and Staphylococcus spp., all of which were obtained from biomaterials of farm animals, feed samples, bedding, water from livestock buildings, washouts from environmental objects, and food products. The resistance of bacterial isolates was determined using microbiological and molecular-genetic research methods. Results: During monitoring studies, 1489 bacterial isolates were isolated. In total, 408 bacterial isolates were tested for sensitivity to antimicrobial agents, including E. coli (47.6%), Salmonella spp. (30.4%), Enterococcus spp. (11.3%), and Campylobacter spp. (10.8%). For genetic characterization, 95 isolates of Salmonella enterica, E. coli, Campylobacter spp., L. monocytogenes, Staphylococcus spp., Enterococcus spp. were chosen from the research collection, which was formed as part of the monitoring program for antibiotic resistance. Conclusion: Deposited isolates that underwent whole-genome analysis can be used as positive control samples both in the development and use of methods or test systems for the detection of various resistance genes in zoonotic bacteria. In addition, such isolates can also be used for microbiological studies related to determining the sensitivity of microorganisms to antibacterial drugs, for phenotypic studies in the diagnosis of various bacterial infections in animals and birds, and retrospective analysis of strains from numerous collections. Keywords: antibiotics, bioresource centers, genes, microorganisms, prevalence, resistance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVeterinary WorldSame topicSecurity, Politics, and Digital TransformationFrench-language works237,207