Incidence of interstitial lung disease and cardiotoxicity with trastuzumab deruxtecan in breast cancer patients: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) has been shown to benefit progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer (mBC) after progression on ≥1 human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted therapies. However, interstitial lung disease (ILD) and cardiotoxicity are the most significant toxicities associated with T-DXd. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the incidence and severity of these toxicities in mBC patients treated with T-DXd. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus databases, and conferences websites for randomized clinical trials and nonrandomized studies of intervention including HER2-low or HER2-positive mBC patients who received at least one dose of T-DXd. Statistical analysis was carried out using R software. RESULTS: We included 15 studies comprising 1970 patients with a mean follow-up of 13.3 months. Median age ranged from 53 to 59 years, 61.9% were non-Asian, and 67.4% had hormone receptor-positive mBC. In a pooled analysis, the incidence of ILD was 11.7% [222 patients; 95% confidence interval (CI) 9.1% to 15.0%]. Patients receiving T-DXd dose of 6.4 mg/kg developed a significantly higher rate of ILD (22.7%) compared to those receiving a dose of 5.4 mg/kg (9.3%) (P < 0.01). Most cases of ILD (80.2%; 174/217 patients) were mild (grade 1 or 2). Grade 3 or 4 ILD was reported in 29 patients (13.4%), and grade 5 in 14 patients (6.4%). The incidence of decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 1.95% (95% CI 0.65% to 3.73%), and the QT interval (QTi) prolongation was 7.77% (95% CI 2.74% to 20.11%). Most patients were asymptomatic, but four had LV dysfunction and heart failure (0.26%). CONCLUSIONS: In this meta-analysis of 1970 patients with mBC, treatment with T-DXd was associated with a 11.7% incidence of ILD, 7.7% incidence of prolonged QTi, and 1.9% incidence of reduced LVEF. Early detection and management of T-DXd-related toxicity by a multidisciplinary team may ultimately improve patient outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.018 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.014 | 0.030 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".