Xp22.33p22.13 Duplication in a Male Patient Carrying a Recombinant X Chromosome Derived from an Inherited Intrachromosomal Insertion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Intrachromosomal insertions are complex structural rearrangements that are challenging to interpret using classical cytogenetic methods. We report a male patient carrying a recombinant X chromosome derived from a maternally inherited intrachromosomal insertion. The patient exhibited developmental delay, intellectual disability, behavioral disorder, and dysmorphic facial features. To accurately identify the rearrangements in the abnormal X chromosome, additional cytogenetic studies were conducted, including fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), multicolor-banding FISH, and array comparative genomic hybridization. The results showed a recombinant X chromosome, resulting in a 13.05 Mb interstitial duplication of segment Xp22.33-Xp22.13, which was inserted at cytoband Xq26.1. The duplicated region encompasses 99 genes, some of which are associated with the patient's clinical manifestations. We propose that the combined effects of the Xp-duplicated genes may contribute to the patient's phenotype.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".