First Records of <i>Paloa villadolidi</i> from Japan with a Redescription of <i>Odonteleotris macrodon</i> (Teleostei: Butidae)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Seven specimens of Paloa villadolidi Roxas and Ablan, 1940, were collected from Okinawa and Ishigaki islands in the Ryukyu Archipelago, Japan, and their morphologies are described herein. Although this species has been considered as a synonym of Odonteleotris macrodon (Bleeker, 1853) which is redescribed in this study, the former is distinguished from the latter by having a steeper jaw (upper jaw tip not reaching orbit vs. ending below orbit center in O. macrodon), a contrasting number of canine teeth on the jaws (more upper-jaw canines than lower-jaw ones vs. more lower-jaw canines), the absence of distinct fin markings (vs. many small black spots on fin rays), no spots on the caudal-fin base (vs. with a red spot), and a higher number of cephalic sensory canal pores (17 vs. 13 or 14). This study also noted a unique canine teeth arrangement in P. villadolidi, which has canine teeth only in the anterior half of the lower jaw, unlike the canine teeth arrangement of four other butid genera (Incara Rao, 1971, Odonteleotris Gill, 1863, Ophiocara Gill, 1863, and Oxyeleotris Bleeker, 1874), which have an inner row of canine teeth in the posterior half of the lower jaw. Although further study is needed to determine the taxonomic status of P. polylepis Herre, 1927, the other nominal species of the genus, the present study tentatively considered it valid based on the original description, which described it as having a deeper body than P. villadolidi. The seven Japanese specimens were identified as P. villadolidi, as they have slenderer bodies than P. polylepis, and they represent the first Japanese records of the species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".