Retracted: An Integration Of Wireless Communications And Artificial Intelligence For Autonomous Vehicles
Post-publication record
OpenAlex flags this work as retracted, but it carries no matching Retraction Watch record in this frame.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The pinnacle of transportation is the development of autonomous driving, which, with the help of CAVs and related traffic management systems, can eventually lead to congestion- and accident-free driving. This vision has as of late prodded extraordinary examination interest in fields including IoV, LTE-V2X, and 5G. In any case, the huge volume of traffic information that CAVs produce makes issues for both the current organizations and the approaching 5G correspondence organizations. For outside network innovations, the VMBS fills in as both a client hub and an edge processing hub. For CAVs, it fills in as a base station and a data caching hub, melding correspondence and calculation. People offer both the VMBS-empowered handset and figuring for CAVs as well as the VMBS-helped wireless innovation for other wireless gadgets to achieve this. It is underlined and addressed that there are a number of research obstacles and open questions. Last but not least, the results of the simulation show that the planned VMBS-CCNA may significantly enhance throughput, latency, and the average amount of links.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".