Investigation of anomalous triple gauge couplings in μγ collision at multi-TeV muon colliders
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The pursuit of discovery in particle physics has always required study at the highest possible energies. Multi-TeV muon colliders, which have important advantages, offer unprecedented potential for investigating new physics beyond the Standard Model. We extensively assume a range of center-of-mass energies from 3 to 30 TeV and a range of integrated luminosities from 1 to 90 ab−1 for future multi-TeV muon colliders. We perform a phenomenological study of the anomalous WWγ couplings via the process [Formula: see text] using a model-independent analysis in the effective field theory framework at multi-TeV muon colliders. The sensitivity estimates obtained for the anomalous WWγ couplings at systematic uncertainties of δsys = 0%, 3%, 5% are compared with the experimental results. Our best sensitivity limits at 95% confidence level for cWWW/Λ2, [Formula: see text], c B /Λ2, c W /Λ2, and [Formula: see text] couplings are [−0.030; 0.025], [−0.014; 0.014], [−0.185; 0.187], [−0.187; 0.189], and [−1.177; 1.097] TeV−2 at the multi-TeV muon collider with center-of-mass energy of 30 TeV and integrated luminosity of 90 ab−1, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".