New Research Directions on Vulnerable and Marginalized Communities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The growing attention to social injustices, discrimination, and other challenges faced by marginalized communities highlights the deep-seated and complex nature of these issues. The ongoing crises, including war in Ukraine, the challenges to democratic systems, the climate crisis, and the lingering effects of the Covid-19 pandemic, exacerbate the vulnerabilities and exclusions experienced by these groups. As organizational scholars, it is our moral responsibility to study these processes so that they can be better addressed and ultimately eradicated. This symposium builds upon the growing body of organizational scholarship on marginalized communities to explore the various challenges they face and the strategies that can alleviate or challenge marginalization. In a time of increased hostility towards marginalized communities and the organizations that support them, it is crucial to gain a deeper understanding of the diverse injustices and exclusions faced by these groups, how these challenges manifest in different contexts, how they can be addressed, and what might be the unintended (harmful) consequences of such efforts. Organization studies as a multi-disciplinary field is particularly well-suited to examine how institutional and organizational efforts, as well as individual responses, can help disrupt and overcome marginalization. Modern Slavery: Unintentional Implications of Institutional and Organizational Arrangements Author: Hong Bui; Birmingham City U. Author: Mia Raynard; U. of British Columbia Organizing Research On Organization Serving Senior Citizens Author: Bryant A. Hudson; IÉSEG School of Management Author: Romain Vacquier; PSL, U. of Paris, Dauphine, DRM, Management & Organisation How A Colombian Peacebuilding Social Intermediary Navigates Community Exit Author: Andrea Caldwell Marquez; U. of Texas At San Antonio Author: Emily S. Block; U. of Alberta Author: Kelly Rubey; U. of Notre Dame Author: Viva Ona Bartkus; U. of Notre Dame Author: Joseph Sweeney; U. of Notre Dame 'When the helpers need help': Finding Meaningfulness at Work In A Compound Crisis Author: Emma Sandström; Aalto U. School of Business Author: Farah Kodeih; IESEG School of Management
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.016 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.039 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.017 | 0.042 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.014 |
| Research integrity | 0.010 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.027 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".