Quality of Life in Pediatrics With Intractable Epilepsy at King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective The aim of this study was to assess the cognitive, emotional, social, and physical domains of quality of life (QoL) in pediatric patients with intractable epilepsy with an emphasis on depressed mood and suicidal ideation (SI). Methods This is a cross-sectional study conducted in pediatric neurology outpatient clinics in King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. The sample consisted of 59 parents whose children aged 4-14 years of either sex had intractable epilepsy. The Quality of Life in Childhood Epilepsy Questionnaire - 55 (QOLCE-55) scale examined four domains of life: cognitive, emotional, social, and physical. Depressed mood and SI were part of the emotional domain. Results The mean ± SD age of children was 8.2 ± 3.25. The mean ± SD of overall QoL was 43.02 ± 15.70, which reflected a poor QoL. Age was not related to the QoL. Female gender was significantly associated with a lower overall QoL (P = 0.0477). Patients with comorbidities had statistically insignificant lower QoL in the cognitive, social, and physical domains in addition to lower overall QoL. Seven of nine participants who reported feeling down reported having SI in the last four weeks (P < 0.001). Conclusions An intractable epilepsy-imposed burden negatively impacts all domains of QoL. Furthermore, females experience lower overall QoL compared to males. Children with comorbidities also tend to have lower QoL scores, although the differences were statistically insignificant. Additionally, a history of feeling down is associated with SI.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".