Bibliographic record
Abstract

 
 
 Contents
 Introduction
 Academic Freedom in Africa: Between Local Powers and International Donors
 Hocine Khelfaoui & Ibrahim Oanda Ogachi ......................... v
 Libertés académique en Afrique : entre pouvoirs locaux et bailleurs de fonds internationaux
 Hocine Khelfaoui & Ibrahim Oanda Ogachi ............................. xv
 The Challenges of Feminism: Gender, Ethics and Responsible Academic Freedom in African Universities
 Amina Mama ...................................... 1
 Neo-liberalism and the Subversion of Academic Freedom from Within: Money, Corporate Cultures and ‘Captured’ Intellectuals in African Public Universities
 Ibrahim Oanda Ogachi ................................ 25
 Academic Freedom and the Constriction of Democratic Space in Botswana: Reflections from an Academic-cum-Politicianin the University Space
 Taolo Lucas ............................................. 49
 Regulatory Bodies, Academic Freedom and Institutional Autonomy in Africa: Issues and Challenges – The Nigerian Example
 Elijah Adewale Taiwo ............................. 63
 Peer Review Mechanisms: The Bottleneck of Academic Freedom
 Elizabeth Ayalew ......................................... 91
 Liberté académique en question : contribution à la problématisation d’une notion à partir du cas estudiantin au Sénégal
 Abdoulaye Guèye ............................ 113
 Libertés académiques, syndicalisme et politique en Côte d’Ivoire
 Goin Bi Zamblé Théodore .................................. 133
 Pursuing Excellence in a ‘World-Class African University’: The Mamdani Affair and the Politics of Global Higher Education
 Isaac A. Kamola .................................... 147
 
 
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.046 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".